American consumers and businesses buy insurance coverage to protect their personal and business assets from collection in the event that a claim is brought against them for causing an accident or injury. Their insurance company has a legal duty to make decisions regarding the claim that do not unreasonably expose the policyholder to the risk of losing their assets. While it is legally permissible for the insurance company to fight the claim in an effort to avoid paying out any money, the insurance company cannot unreasonably pursue the fight to the extent that the policyholder is at risk for a court judgment that would exceed the amount of insurance coverage the policyholder has in place. If the insurance company unreasonably fights the claim, resulting in a judgment that exceeds the insurance coverage, and the policyholder’s assets become subject to collection, the policyholder may sue their own insurance company for Bad Faith. Bad Faith is simply the allegation that an insurance company negligently or improperly failed to settle or to adjust a claim for an amount of money within the amount of insurance coverage, and it resulted in the policyholder being placed at risk of losing their assets.
If you would like us to investigate
your claim, contact our office for assistance.
Reust v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. - 2006 Cross-Claimant Reust had a State Auto homeowner's policy with $100,000 liability coverage. Reust's dog dog bit off girlfriend's lip. State Auto denied his girlfriend's claim, refused to indemnify Reust and refused to provide him with a defense when he was sued by his girlfriend. A judgement was rendered against Reust by his girlfriend, and Reust sued his own insurance company for failing to honor their contractual obligations and bad faith. OHIO TRIAL REPORTER ARTICLE Settlement: $2,400,000.00 insurance bad faith