ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAW
1360 West 9th Street
Suite 200
Cleveland, OH 44113

Phone: 216.522.9000
Toll Free: 866.522.9500
Fax: 216.522.9007
law firm home Home
  Directions to Landskroner Grieco Madden
  Submit an Inquiry
 

 

Landskroner Foundation for Children Diversity

 

 Bookmark Us

 E-mail This Site to a Friend

 

 

 

 

 

Personal Injury
Sub-category of: Business Litigation

Stockbrokers and investment advisors owe a duty to manage and invest their clients’ funds in a suitable and appropriate manner for the client.  As more individuals turn to stockbrokers and investment advisors to save for education or retirement, the instances of broker misconduct has increased.  Brokers and advisors may put their own financial interest ahead of their clients’ interests.  

The most common cases of misconduct involve recommendations of unsuitable investments, typically products of a broker’s institution which the broker has incentive to push on his or her client.  Investing in unsuitable stocks or programs may put the client in an excessively risky position where the client, who is often elderly and of limited means, may lose most or all of his or her savings. Similarly, a broker or advisor may over-concentrate a client’s funds into one particular area instead of properly diversifying assets.  This can either limit the growth of the client’s money or can lose it all.  The worst cases of misconduct involve churning, where a broker continues to buy and sell for the client, generating fees for the broker and often exhausting the client’s savings. 

If you would like us to investigate your claim, contact our office for assistance.

Landskroner Grieco Madden Practical law articles

 

 

Recent Stockbroker misconduct Cases at Landskroner Grieco Madden

John Doe v. XYZ Brokerage House - 2006
Respondent broker and brokerage house advertised financial services to Petitioner, a retired telephone services lineman.  Broker had minimal experience in the field and failed to diversify Petitioner's retirement savings, resulting in a loss of over 60% of his savings.  Broker had allocated most of Petitioner's funds to inappropriate high-risk tech stocks when Petitioner's goals were asset protection and slow growth.  An Arbitration claim was filed with the NASD alleging Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Churning, Misrepresentation and Fraud.  A confidential settlement was reached prior to the arbitration hearing.

flag Pre-Hearing Settlement: Confidential Business Litigation

 

 
The Landskroner Law Firm dba Landskroner . Grieco . Madden © 2007 All text, site design and rights reserved.spacer | Disclaimerspacer | Privacy Policy